Text below taken from comment on Reidar Visser’s page (excepting wikipedia page). Make sure to click the pictures for details. It is very possible Reidar is pys-oping…sooo, no conclusions yet!
“Ah, another beautifully written article regarding the subject of the suppression of dissent at the hands of government apparatchiks. It is so refreshing to see this topic explored by someone that isn’t…well…American. When I speak to my fellow Americans about the transformation of law enforcement from “peace officers” to “secret police” they usually have no idea what I am talking about. Regardless, the foundation of the entire global system as [sic] based on the tactics and operations of the East German STASI. I highly suggest everyone review the documentary “STASI: East Germany’s Secret Police” produced by Film Europa in 2007. Watch that movie, and your eyes will be opened to not only what they are doing to dissidents, how they are doing it, and perhaps most importantly of all, why the police are motivated to target individuals that have committed no crime.”
“I will try to address the issues in your post as they are presented. The Chinese Water Torture aspect is related to the STASI concept of “Soft Kill”, specifically enumerated in STASI Directive 1/76, or the infamous “Disintegration Directive”. Not to go into too much detail, but please bear in mind that we live in a world where police kicking, beating, and shoving people can be viewed, in real time, by the entire world. Can anyone say “Public Relations Nightmare”? Sure you can! Put simply, the new goal of the police is destroying someone without the person themselves knowing who the enemy is, or why they are being targeted, and of course leaving the casual observer completely clueless. Again, please review “STASI: East Germany’s Secret Police” for a proper explanation of the soft kill concept.
Audio and visual stimulus (bright headlights and loud motorcycles) is simply “anchoring”. Not complicated at all. It helps acclimate the target to the concept that “when you hear or see this stimuli, you will react with fear”. Again , not rocket science at all.
On the issue of being followed by uniformed police, simple intimidation tactics. If you own a mobile phone, it is likely you are being tracked via that device. In a recent court decision here in America, police were granted the right to use mobile phone data without permission from the court. This decision makes the suppression of political dissidents exponentially easy for law enforcement. Not that the police had a hard time before, or even followed the rules, but there you have it. To confirm this, please remove the battery from your phone, then walk or ride your bike to a remote location and wait for an hour or so. Then, plug the battery back in to your phone and see how long it takes for a police officer or informant to find their way to your location. Not very long, I bet.
The use of modified vehicles would denote persons with a criminal history. Punk kids dealing drugs or assaulting people for no good reason. The STASI model is employing armies of informants. Hundreds of informants, thousands of informants, hundreds of thousands of informants! What pool do the police recruit their informants from? Why, CRIMINALS of course. Would anyone expect Catholic nuns or basket-weavers to be the class enemy? Of course not. Using the STASI model, anyone and everyone that commits a crime WILL be pressured to become an informant. In America, informants are given “consideration” for their cooperation with the police. Or, in other words, the more work you do as an informant, the less time in prison you will be subjected to. Again, as always, please review “STASI: East Germany’s Secret Police” for a more detailed explanation into the concept of the creation and deployment of confidential informants from the criminal class.
In summation, my research has helped me discover at least some of the motivations of law enforcement as it pertains to the suppression of dissent, and it all comes down to one word. Fear. Yes, fear. The police, and by default any government that engages in STASI-style suppression, are terrified of their own citizens. How is this so? Please research the East German Uprising of 1953. During that event, the East German people very nearly overthrew their communist oppressors. Only the intervention of Soviet troops stopped the Germans from reuniting, but it also gave birth to the STASI in it’s true form, and codified it’s true mission. Suppress dissent BEFORE it happens. Or, in simple terms…though crime.”
“In closing, let me share a story. A few weeks ago, after months of research, I conducted a very simple experiment. In order to confirm police involvement in my suppression of my political freedoms, or “gangstalking”, I decided to reach out to a small number of individuals I strongly suspect of being police informants. I put together a simple yet colorful one-page flyer that says POLICE ARE 236% MORE LIKELY TO RAPE! and MOST VICTIMS OF POLICE RAPE ARE CHILDREN! and some other truly horrible statistics are are, oddly enough, completely true and correct, being taken from actual FBI crime statistics. I then included about 30 news reports of police raping infants, engaging in sex-slavery, raping multiple children, torturing and murdering their wives, and all manner of sordid acts. Can you guess what happened next? The vehicle traffic of informants at my home ceased…instantly. For years there has been near constant traffic here on this secluded little road that pretty much leads to nowhere. Now it is virtually empty, weeks later. I chose to stop passing out these flyers for now, as they hinder my ongoing investigation. It is hard to document something that is no longer happening, so be careful when you engage in counter-propaganda operations.
The concept of suppression of political dissent is based on keeping the target on the run, afraid, confused, depressed, and ultimately destroyed. It is all spelled out in black and white in STASI Directive 1/76. But there is a flaw in this program. A fatal flaw, in fact. What if the target refuses to be afraid? What if the target stops, and turns on his attackers. All bullies are cowards, and this includes the police. Once you turn around and give them some of their own medicine, they flee like the chicken-shits they are. Therefore, never leave the house without your hidden camera. Always walk up and engage suspected informants in friendly conversation, learn their faces. Let them know that you are watching them in the same manner as they are watching you. Eventually, one of them will make a critical mistake, and you will be there to record it all…then upload it to YouTube! When thousands of people do this, and collate their evidence, this archaic concept of “gangstalking”, a dinosaur from the last century, will be exposed and obliterated in the same manner as Hitler, Mousilini, and Ceaușescu.”
“Conspiracy of Silence, a documentary listed for viewing in TV Guide Magazine was to be aired on the Discovery Channel, on May 3, 1994. This documentary exposed a network of religious leaders and Washington politicians who flew children to Washington D.C. for sex orgies. Many children suffered the indignity of wearing nothing but their underwear and a number displayed on a piece of cardboard hanging from their necks when being auctioned off to foreigners in Las Vegas, Nevada and Toronto, Canada. At the last minute before airing, unknown congressmen threatened the TV Cable industry with restrictive legislation if this documentary was aired. Almost immediately, the rights to the documentary were purchased by unknown persons who had ordered all copies destroyed. A copy of this videotape was furnished anonymously to former Nebraska state senator and attorney John De Camp who made it available to retired FBI Agent Ted L. Gunderson. While the video quality is not top grade, this tape is a blockbuster in what is revealed by the participants involved.” unknown
documentary by dnCRYPTOME
“(±) False Tallies: The Prisoner’s Dilemma? Source Authenticity from Cold War to Surveillance State
Fugitive defectors and whistleblowers evade sovereignty, territory, citizenship and the inchoate metrics of global political space…
Premiere: Thursday 4 February 2016, 21:00 hrs
Tacit Futures: Building Snowden Archives Transmediale – Anxious to Secure
Auditorium, Haus der Kulturen der Welt, BERLIN
Vauban’s masterful engineering of militarized borders in defense of the emerging 17th century nation-state provokes our genealogical tracking of Nikolai Evgenievich Khokhlov (b.1922, USSR) and Edward Joseph Snowden (b.1983, USA).
These two mobile, highly aliased agents of modern state militaries are insurgent territorial engineers in their own right. Deploying in shifting geopolitical and technological contexts 60 years apart, each eventually ruptures from his boundary maintenance agency, fracturing within post-Vaubanian archipelagoes of Berlin in the case of Khokhlov, and Hawaii in the case of Snowden.
Khokhlov and Snowden play the sovereignty game to exhaustion along the 60 year continuum of an inexorably debordering world order. Eventually, their state-imposed aliases, legends and false citizenships collapse into the contingent identities and private fictions of diasporic personhood and the Prisoner’s Dilemma.
In 1954, Nikolai Evgenievich Khokhlov renounces NKVD/KGB scripts that cast him as a border-crossing state assassin.
So too, NSA efforts to re-territorialize sovereignty in response to the 21st century crisis of the national border could not have fallen to a less compliant subject than a placeless, fugitive, dilemmic identity: a.k.a. TheTrueHOOHAH, Verax, Cincinnatus and Citizenfour — who re-brands himself in May 2013 as Edward Joseph Snowden.
Thus unmoored from the engineering of its militarized border, the state archive disclosed by Snowden eschews the sovereignty demanded by all proprietary regimes and seeks full reconstitution within a borderless public domain.” – dnCryptome
It is typical of these cases that an indeterminacy originally restricted to the atomic domain becomes transformed into macroscopic indeterminacy, which can then be resolved by direct observation. That prevents us from so naively accepting as valid a “blurred model” for representing reality. In itself, it would not embody anything unclear or contradictory. There is a difference between a shaky or out-of-focus photograph and a snapshot of clouds and fog banks.
—Erwin Schrödinger, Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik (The present situation in quantum mechanics), Naturwissenschaften
(translated by John D. Trimmer in Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society)
Basically, this is a big deal because it is a macro-system that has wave-particle duality and other only quantum micro-atomo-system properties. More here (not that I have read and understood the related article): http://math.mit.edu/~bush/?p=3087 & http://math.mit.edu/~bush/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Oza-PhF-2014.pdf
***Please note this leak seems to very heavily implicate nations excluding the USA and Canada, and it might have been motivated in part by a smear campaign, propaganda. The information good nevertheless; although, I have not personally reviewed their original leak content. Cheers!
“In the months that followed, the number of documents continued to grow far beyond the original leak. Ultimately, SZ acquired about 2.6 terabytes of data, making the leak the biggest that journalists had ever worked with. The source wanted neither financial compensation nor anything else in return, apart from a few security measures.
The data provides rare insights into a world that can only exist in the shadows. It proves how a global industry led by major banks, legal firms, and asset management companies secretly manages the estates of the world’s rich and famous: from politicians, Fifa officials, fraudsters and drug smugglers, to celebrities and professional athletes.”
- Süddeutsche Zeitung, Frederik Obermaier, Bastian Obermayer, Vanessa Wormer and Wolfgang Jaschensky
“The Panama Papers expose the internal operations of one of the world’s leading firms in incorporation of offshore entities, Panama-headquartered Mossack Fonseca. The 2.6 terabytes of data that make up the Panama Papers files were obtained by German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung and shared with ICIJ and more than 100 media partners.
The leak contains more than 11.5 million internal files of the company. It includes nearly 40 years of data, from 1977 through the end of 2015. The data contains a few incorporations before 1977, but they are sporadic and represent less than 1% of the companies. Although the data within the leak stretches back to 1977, Mossack Fonseca only came into being under its current name and structure in 1986, when Ramón Fonseca merged his small, one-secretary law firm in Panama with another local firm headed by Jürgen Mossack, a Panamanian of German origin.
The data shows that Mossack Fonseca worked with more than 14,000 banks, law firms, company incorporators and other middlemen to set up companies, foundations and trusts for customers. ICIJ used the country categorization contained in the leaked internal client database to describe how many intermediaries were in each country.
This internal database didn’t have a date for the closing of the companies. In the offshore world entities are hardly closed: they’re either inactivated or they stop paying fees and their status changes to what’s called “struck off” in the offshore lingo. ICIJ considered inactivation and struck off dates as the deactivation date of the companies. In the case of any discrepancy between the two dates, ICIJ used the one that happened first. A company was counted as active from the incorporation date until it was inactivated or struck off.
ICIJ will release the full list of companies and people linked to them in early May.”